Grousing about the old Star Trek CCGs got me thinking about Trek games. Years ago I saw a forum post on Boardgamegeek that superbly captured the issue most of them suffer from. I can’t find the post now, but paraphrased it went something like:
“Star Trek is focused on moral issues. No Trek game ever has been.”
To my mind that’s exactly the problem. All of the Star Trek games I’ve played—and I’ve played quite a lot of them—focus either on completing scientific tasks or on combat. Both of those things feature in Trek, of course, but (at least in the good episodes) they’re window-dressing for some other, more universal dilemma.
There’s been one brief exception, and it’s all the more powerful because it demonstrates how remarkable a Trek game that feels like Trek could be. Back in the SNES days there was a game called Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Starship Bridge Simulator. (That’s a mouthful! Let’s call it ST:SA.) ST:SA was, for the most part, about combat. It played like Wing Commander, X-Wing, or the Freespace games: a flight sim set amongst the stars, where the goal is to shoot down opposing vessels.
However, there was one mission that was absolutely brilliant. I can no longer recall the details, but the player had to deal with a Gorn vessel. The Gorn are not the friendliest of species, and after going through a conversation tree I was dropped into the usual fight. Destroying the Gorn vessel earned me a passing grade on the mission (this was the Starfleet Academy game, the missions were graded)—but not full points.
That was striking. Overwhelmingly the game rewarded fighting prowess. Most gameplay time was spent in battles. What had gone wrong?
I had. I had settled into a routine of “Star Trek-themed space sim,” but the designers still had in mind what Star Trek was all about. With this mission they set out to see whether you were playing according to Trek’s ideals.
After several replays, I realized that it was possible to avoid the fight entirely—but to do so, the player had to communicate with the Gorn in a way that a Gorn would respect. Offering help and being polite made them feel talked down to. Be bombastic, on the other hand, and the Gorn knew they were being taken seriously. If the player took the time to read up on the Gorn and then leveraged that knowledge to find a productive way to communicate, they would go peacefully on their way and the player got a 100% for the mission.
That single mission was the most Star Trek thing in any Star Trek game I’ve ever played. It was about diplomacy. It was about empathy. It was about building a bridge between the player and someone who seemed to be nothing like the player.
Unfortunately, it’s a moment that’s never really been repeated. Even ST:SA went back to dogfighting.
I want to play a Star Trek game that maintains the spirit and sensibility of that mission throughout. A game where creating earns better rewards than breaking, where both competition and cooperation are valued.
That game doesn’t yet exist. I guess I’d better get to work.
7 thoughts on “Something Completely Different: Star Trek Games Done Right”
ALL THE YES.
If you give up, LMK and I’ll steal this idea.
Or, if you want to work together, LMK.
I have an old idea for a Star Trek game based loosely on Arabian Nights that could totally fit this ethos.
Work on a social game with a past master of social deduction games? You know I’m in. I’ll send an email.
Check out the FASA “Star Trek” RPG. I can’t think of a SINGLE published adventure that DIDN’T have some kind of moral delimma in it. Brilliant and faithful. And I think there already was a Star Trek game based on the Arabian Knights board game (but BGG is down right now so I can’t get the title!)
Thanks for the tip! Some of the local FLGSes have a section for classic and used RPG books; I’ll see what’s in stock.
“A game where creating earns better rewards than breaking, where both competition and cooperation are valued.” Another brilliant design in FASA’s Star Trek was that each player basically had a 90% in their field of expertise, but pretty much a 10%-20% in all other areas. So it really encouraged cooperation because you NEEDED the other players to get anything done. The ship-to-ship combat system was the same. The captain gave orders but each other station handled the specifics (assigning power, firing weapons, scanning enemies, etc.) in whatever way they wanted. It made for really tense but really involved playing. Some of the best roleplaying I’ve ever done. And I believe it was “Star Trek: The Adventure Game” that was based on the paragraph format of “Arabian Nights” http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/3095/star-trek-adventure-game
Wow! I can’t believe it really exists. That’s awesome.
My thanks as well!
I’ve long noticed the high regard that FASA’s Trek system is held in, even after Last Unicorn Games’ and Decipher’s editions came along. Before I wasn’t clear on why; now I’m getting the sense of it!